Every year, thousands of RPL Report (Recognition of Prior Learning) get rejected by ACS (Australian Computer Society) for many reasons. ACS uses various parameters and guidelines to measure RPL Reports. Some are plagiarism-free, 100% unique and original, inadequate work experience and specific qualifications, nominated occupation ANZSCO Code, documents proof, and many more. There are many reasons for RPL rejection.
ACS is the prime authority that checks and validates your RPL Report. If ACS finds any faults, then they reject your RPL Report. So, be careful while writing and submitting RPL Report to ACS.
Common reasons for RPL Rejection
1. Irrelevant or Unrelated job description
RPL means a report that showcases a candidate’s qualification, skills, experiences, and knowledge in the related field of occupation. For this reason, the applicants need to try to include their best capabilities in the RPL Report that includes all the details of the work experience, roles, and duties performed during the project period in the related company of ICT.
The candidates need to be aware that 65 % of the roles, duties, and responsibilities mentioned in the RPL Report must be written following the nominated occupation and the experience closely related to ANZSCO Codes. If you cannot fulfill the criteria and guidelines of ACS, then you will be rejected and declared as “Not suitable due to lack of information”.
The applicants need to very much be sure about their job description for which occupation applied. If the description doesn’t match the related occupation mentioned by ANZSCO Code, then the candidate’s RPL will be rejected by ACS. So only the applicants should be careful in considering related job tasks with the related occupation.
While submitting RPL Reports to ACS, the candidates should be careful about plagiarism. There are many RPL Report samples available on the Internet, but these samples are only for reference. Please do not copy or paste them directly into your RPL Report. If the ACS finds any plagiarism in the applicant RPL Report, there are high chances of getting rejected by ACS. ACS asks every candidate to write their RPL Report on their own that is 100% original and unique. Altogether plagiarism is the major reason to be rejected by ACS.
Don’t be a cheater when writing an RPL Report, as it needs to be completely original. Most people download RPL sample reports from a website, copy the entire sample, and send it to the ACS. But these RPL reports are just the guide to help you to create your own RPL Project Report. ACS uses advanced plagiarism detection software and rejects reports if they find any plagiarism.
Hence, focus on research, cross-check with samples, use a grammar checker, and plagiarism detection software like TURNITIN or Grammarly to write plagiarism-free RPL Report. For this, you can always seek professional RPL Report Writers and editors as you can be assured of 100% original, unique, and plagiarism-free reports. It will increase the probability to get positively assessed by ACS.
3. Fake Job Description
The only principal source of information about your ICT knowledge and skills is your job description. So, choose job descriptions that are accurate and relevant. With the job description, you need to include your relevant work experience and your skills while working as an ICT professional.
You need to complete 65% of the tasks listed in your RPL Report and experience letter. If your applied job matches the job description entirely, then your RPL Report will be rejected. Hence, candidates need to showcase the specific skills that are relevant to the position.
So, choose your project carefully. Select only those tasks that let you showcase your knowledge and abilities as stated in the ANZSCO Code you prefer to apply for. The majority of applicants fought to select the nominated ANZSCO Codes for their occupation.
4. Insufficient Work Experience
There are many policies that ACS follow in assessing the skill level of the candidates. Applicants need to be clear in listing the skill level of the candidates. For skilled migration, applicants need to have certain years of suitable work experience only after that skills and knowledge are recognized for employment and eligibility.
Overall, it means the work experience of the applied candidates could not meet the eligibility of RPL policies, and then the ACS will be rejected by saying “Not Suitable due to lack of Experience”.
You need to consider work experience in a skilled employment reference letter. Additionally, you need to submit relevant work experience under the skilled migration requirements. Here is how you need to write work experience:
- On the employment letterhead, don’t forget to include the candidate’s name, working hours, applicant position, job roles and responsibilities, and identifying details.
- You need to submit business registration information and official statements from a registered account in the nominated occupation list and work as an ICT Professional.
The application will be rejected with “Inappropriate report format or due to lack of experience” if they couldn’t fulfill the criteria of ACS.
Some other reasons for RPL Rejection
In your RPL Report, don’t forget to include information about your company, the name of the task you completed, supplementary organization, and your assigned role in each project.
- Work out your designated responsibilities and duties for each project. Showcase how your ideas are implemented in the planning and development of each task that includes your stable zones.
- Describe the various techniques used in each tasks system analysis and design phase
- Showcase the names of the programming languages used in the task to demonstrate your programming expertise
How to avoid RPL Rejection from ACS?
Recognition of Prior Learning(RPL) concerns applicants who are not qualified or partly qualified in Information and Communication Technology(ICT), but the applicant needs to have good experience in the ICT field.
The RPL Form where you submit candidate’s information has some format and criteria, so candidates need to fill and submit documents to the Australian Computer Society.
ACS is the assessing body that is strictly related to the filter of the RPL Report of applied candidates under the guidelines of ANZSCO Codes. ACS has some eligibility criteria which the applying candidates need to follow. If not, the ACS will reject your RPL Report within a sec.
So, to avoid RPL rejection from ACS by not including plagiarism content in your RPL Report, try writing an RPL report on your own, and consider the above points while writing Report. You can always seek help from expert professional writers if you need any help.
Candidates who can apply for RPL Skill Assessment are
- For candidates with insufficient ICT Knowledge, acknowledged through their respective work experience in a related field, six years of work experience is required in the related ANZSCO Code.
- Candidates without tertiary ICT knowledge need extra two more years of experience to understand how ICT works, and the candidates require eight years of experience.
Why Seek for Professional Help?
If you don’t want to risk RPL Report Rejection and don’t want to waste time and money, you can contact ACSRPLAustralia. We provide complete RPL Writing Service from professional experts, and they understand ACS guidelines and criteria very well.